I always find it interesting to note which topics of conversation generate the blog spam. There are some regulars around digi land that are frequently mentioned here. I think they have given up the battle. They know eventually the topic will turn and it will be on to something else. Admittedly, I am not active around the "community" but I have been hosting the blog for awhile now and have noticed some trends.
Watch out when the blog bitches find a new target. They keep picking, they Google, they dig, they hunt IP's, they search other message boards, they jump in the way back machine and remind all of indiscretions of yesteryear.
The blog target virgins pick up the bat phone. Put out a virtual call for back up send the blog link to all. Their friends will try to defend, try to call everyone out for being anonymous. It gets nasty. They can't win against the blog bitches. So then they try diversionary tactics, attempt to change the subject to some other digi crime in recent memory. When that doesn't work, they resort to spam. Song lyrics, in multiple languages, middle school trash talk. Anything to bury the previous threads of conversation.
And don't forget about the Pearl clutching handslappers. You know, the ones that just want everyone to get along and sing Kum Bay Yah. The ones that scold people for posting, and wasting their time reading this internet trash, all while offering helpful alternate suggestions for spending time. You know, like watching kids, cooking dinner for your husband, reading the bible.
And the Lurkers, that stop by for entertainment value.
Which category are you?
1,552 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 601 – 800 of 1552 Newer› Newest»Hee hee! Sure, why not?
TheMommason is all over the freakin' internet.
March 15, 2010 11:09 PM
-------------
Holy moly! She really IS everywhere, lol.
Not if you can get something almost the same for free at the same store:
http://www.oscraps.com/shop/product.php?productid=22636&cat=287&page=3
March 15, 2010 11:11 PM
----------------
But that's a rectangle, which makes all the difference.
^^^
I see, thanks for enlightening me.
Does anyone else feel like some designers are ***way*** overrated?
I'm sick of hearing people say that some designers are so great when they're not.
Does anyone else feel like some designers are ***way*** overrated?
I'm sick of hearing people say that some designers are so great when they're not.
March 15, 2010 11:38 PM
Yes!
I think some designers are so stuck on themselves they shit their own ego!
Oh dear. I'm a designer. I sure as heck hope I don't come across that way.
se it gets deleted:
Kazadoodle:
Originally Posted by TheMommason
FYI quoting wikipedia as a good source drops your cediblity to about a -1000000. Nevermind the eqation of creidts tracking to carring for your children which won it's on special place in brainless comment of the day..* Ouch ouch eye sprain *
Being rude and insulting does not make you any more credible.
And special place for brainless comment goes right here
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMommason
Typing slowly so does not have the same effect as talking slowly...
You do have some valid and interesting points to make, but if you presented them politely and comprehensively, maybe someone would pay attention.
__________________
*~Karin~*
An Illustrated Journey - my blog
Reply from TheMommason:
I'm sorry that you missed the 6 previous comments where it was said nicely and this was once again trying to get someone to actually stop twisting what was being said. Sorry you missed on the Hummie rips and stalking and decided to come after me.
I didn't tell people that making credit lists is on the same level as careing for their children or that Wikipedia is a good place for legal advice. Please find a new person to pick a fight with sweety I bite.
Nice stolen images that are uncredited on your blog by the way.
March 15, 2010 10:25 PM
-----------
Your point in posting this?
I'm sick of hearing people say that some designers are so great when they're not.
March 15, 2010 11:38 PM
------------
And I'm sock of hearing people say some singers are great, when they're not. Or some TV shows are great, when they're not.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Just because one person doesn't like something, doesn't mean it's no good. Don't like it? Simple - don't buy it!
One persons trash is another persons treasure.
For me the best thing about that thread is that Shannon isn't around to close it.....
themommyson is just plain nasty.
Her condescending use of terms such as 'colorist' and 'extractor' toward designers demonstrates she has some kind of chip on her shoulder.
If I were any of the designers for whom she is displaying a 'fan' blinkie, I would ask her to remove it. I wouldn't want to be associated with her in any way!!!!
And BTW: I think it IS definitely an
'anti-crediting' movement. Not only that, but it's a PLOY to try to get people to join her
scrappers playground community. Here's a quote from Jenn herself:
"Well, y’all just come on and post your layouts over here. We’ll never jump on you for not having credits. We might pester you to help us find something you used that we simply HAVE to have… but we love to see your work! We all benefit when everyone shares, you never know where inspiration comes from!"
One mistake Jenn is making is assuming that galleries are making rules about posting credits. I just checked SBB, DST, TDS and MSA and none of them require credits.
Sorry Jenn...You're going to have to come up with some other ploy to get people to join your sorry-ass community!
^^^^^^^
I agree. But, Jenn must be trying to appeal to newbies. At least that's the impression I get when looking at the gallery....
It's very basic and amateurish...it looks like digi-scrapping from 2005
Oh dear. I'm a designer. I sure as heck hope I don't come across that way.
March 16, 2010 2:28 AM
----------------------
You probably don't. I've never noticed designers acting this way, it's usually the CT's.
Does anyone know if they are going to to another SYTYCS/SYTYCD? Just curious.
I agree. But, Jenn must be trying to appeal to newbies. At least that's the impression I get when looking at the gallery....
______________________________
ita
I do find it interesting that Jenn says:
"I am NOT ADVOCATING anyone violate the TOU of a kit! Wherever would you get that idea? I AM advocating not using kits with those kind of crediting requirements. Crediting should be a choice, and NOT crediting should NOT be punished - either by formal rules or informal "culture".
while she is one of the team that makes layered pages for Linda Sattgasts "Scrappers Guide" site members. Scrappers Guide TOU (included multiple times in every download) says the following:
"You may use all graphics and images.... as long as proper credit to Scrapper's Guide AND a link back to http:www.scrappersguide.com is provided for any publication, whether in a gallery, forum, or print publications.
:use the kits and/or elements for scrapbooking submissions and publications, providing that proper credit to ScrappersGuide.com is always given."
So is she advocating that she should not be using the kits included with Scrappers Guide membership, since they do require credit, and she clearly thinks she should not have to give credit (or even use kits from designers that require credit) perhaps she should step down from her team position at Scrappers Guide? Since her philosophy certainly seems to be in conflict with Linda's? And goodness, she should not have to scrap with products that require "proper credit AND a link back" Jenn has also written tutorials for Linda's site, but I wonder if Linda is aware that Jenn is promoting this?
(Perhaps someone would like to direct Linda to Jenn's anti-crediting post?)
I also find it incredibly tacky that she is posting at DST to try to drum up traffic to her own (competing) site. I am actually surprised that her thread wasn't deleted shortly after being posted, trying to draw people to her own site instead of DST.
She is clearly wanting to make a name for herself and her website in the digiscrap community, but at the expense of the people with whom she is supposedly on "their team".
It's not at all clear that she is doing this just to get people to go to her site. She has a legitimate point to make, bottom line, and her motives (not that we know them) are irrelevent.
Moving on to say that it IS interesting (if true) that she works for a site with exactly the sort of policies she objects to.
'One mistake Jenn is making is assuming that galleries are making rules about posting credits. I just checked SBB, DST, TDS and MSA and none of them require credits.'
Jenn's post was in response to a site admin that posted 'rules of the hobby' indicating we should all credit down to the last button. So while the sites you listed may not have those rules, some clearly do. And even if they aren't explicitly writing those rules in their gallery (I haven't checked), they are still pressuring people to follow them.
As for posting at DST - her site is not in competition with DST at all - any more than every single other scrapbooking site on the internet is in competition with DST. DST is a scrappers community, not a store. I have seen people from other sites blatantly invite people there all the time. I cant imagine why it would be in poor taste for her to invite people to her site. But, that being said, her post was not about that (she has done that before and likely will again - as do many site owners), her post was to open what has been a very enlightening can of worms.
As for her work with Scrappers Workshop, I do think that Jenn and Linda need to have a convo there because obviously they don't agree and Jenn should probably not be making items for kits she then advocates people don't use.
As for it being an anti-crediting movement - why do people keep insisting that it is? Why do people keep insisting that they know the intentions of other people? I honestly want an answers - for those of you who insist it is a movement - why are you saying this?
Wow I'm sorry your life is so sad that all you can do for joy is cyber stalk me and post your little anon posts.. Damn I even have one of you hanging on so much to every thing I type you have to copy and paste all my posts. Aweee how flattering in a sad sort of Serial killer in training kind of way. Did you paste the qoutes on your wall with your cyber stalked links and candles and dead animals too?
For the too insulted on my "colorist extractionist" label ate you really saying it is rude and condacending cause you are a colorist or did you miss the couple dozen post on your little slam book here where you all were saying the same thing...oppsie did I call out a gaggle of hypocrtical nutbags again? Or maybe I'm just a butch cause I say what I think as ME not a buch of asskissing BS in public and then go anon to say stuff.
I don't play "If ya can't say something nice" to your face and talk crap behind your back if that is being a rude bitch then there needs to be more of us. You all are closet wannabes. If ya wanna play grow a pair and let's play. At least the people like Hummie are asswhipes in public so I guess I have to give her kudos for that.
PS from now on it's Princess Bitch to U
I think it's funny how Jenn and Co. are now saying they are not against crediting, they are only against being REQUIRED to credit.
Just go back to the original blog post and read the titles. They say...
5 REASONS NOT TO POST CREDITS
they don't say...
5 REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO POST CREDITS.
I'm not guessing anyone's intentions. I'm just reading what has been written. And yes, I interpret the post to be against (ie anti) crediting.
Can anyone else understand what The Mommason is saying in her posts?? It doesn't even make sense. Anger issues.
Also, what is she talking about here:
"Apperantly there is a slam book that dissed in secret but Whoo hoo got an invite from a "fan" sorry to the land of anons"
where is the slam book?
Many schools of thought on writing teach that the title is what brings in the traffic - and I have been taught more than once to use my title as a 'bait and switch' ... people come in and read more if the title is about a negative ... 'how to royally screw up your first date' gets more attention than 'how to have a great first date'. Its a fact of human nature, we are interested in those kind of headlines, so we go read the blog. It doesn't mean you are starting a movement. It's just a way to get people's attention.
Um, I'm guessing this site is the slam book. Actually, I'm the one who posted the quotes, and only because I figured DST would remove them, which would have been a shame because I thought TheMommason had a good point. In any case, kudos to DST for allowing an open coversation without a lot of edits/deletes.
Dear Princess Bitch,
Sorry you've been offended here, but you are really rude to people when there's so need to be.
This is a smack blog, there is a difference. Try to understand.
So designers, a question for you. Would you allow someone who was an amazing layout artist but outspoken, often rude, like "some" in that thread, be on your ct?
*Is* she on any CT's?
I think I'd rather someone who can be honest and brave in the face of bullying than someone who can't be.
So designers, a question for you. Would you allow someone who was an amazing layout artist but outspoken, often rude, like "some" in that thread, be on your ct?
March 16, 2010 4:00 PM
Alot of designers want The Stepford Wives LOL
"As for it being an anti-crediting movement - why do people keep insisting that it is? Why do people keep insisting that they know the intentions of other people? I honestly want an answers - for those of you who insist it is a movement - why are you saying this?
March 16, 2010 2:48 PM"
-----------------------------------
By encouraging people to NOT BUY kits that require credit, she is basically saying NOT TO CREDIT. She is openly trying to have scrappers boycott a lot of designers.
I'm all for open, honest and even heated debates BUT you can accomplish that without the outright rudeness she is displaying. You can disagree with someone without being rude. Well, apparently not her!
And yes, I would not want her on my CT. Her rudeness makes her a bad representative for any designer.
Nothing wrong with being outspoken.
Im glad people are.
CT work is overrated anyways. I would rather buy shit than scrap on a deadline and have to keep my mouth shut to make someone happy.
By encouraging people to NOT BUY kits that require credit, she is basically saying NOT TO CREDIT. She is openly trying to have scrappers boycott a lot of designers.
^^^^^^
No she is trying to say that if you dont like to credit then buy from people who won't get all bent if you don't.
It is the same as saying if you don't like fantasy kits then don't buy from certain designers cause that's all they make.
If crediting was a big issue then designers would require it in galleries.
Noone is saying don't credit but if you want to post on your blog and don't like to credit then buy from designers who are ok with it. Nothing at all wrong with that is there?
For me the best thing about that thread is that Shannon isn't around to close it.....
March 16, 2010 9:18 AM
^^^^^
FTW!!!
So designers, a question for you. Would you allow someone who was an amazing layout artist but outspoken, often rude, like "some" in that thread, be on your ct?
March 16, 2010 4:00 PM
-------------
Being outspoken and rude do not have to go hand in hand. There are DST members who are outspoken, who are not rude. I would have those people on my team.
Um, I'm guessing this site is the slam book. Actually, I'm the one who posted the quotes, and only because I figured DST would remove them, which would have been a shame because I thought TheMommason had a good point. In any case, kudos to DST for allowing an open coversation without a lot of edits/deletes.
March 16, 2010 3:56 PM
------------
What point? I really want to know because I can't read through the garbage to get to the good bits.
Alot of designers want The Stepford Wives LOL
March 16, 2010 4:42 PM
--------
Who can blame them? That's what sells. You only have to check this blog to see that people will boycott a designer if they have a rude bitch CTM.
Who can blame them? That's what sells. You only have to check this blog to see that people will boycott a designer if they have a rude bitch CTM.
March 16, 2010 5:07 PM
^^^
NOT always true! I will boycott a designer if I see they feed off their own ego. What a way to knock them down a few pegs to earth if you stop buying their mediocre shit.
I will also boycott a designer if their attitude is horrible.
CT's do not get me to boycott designers, the designer's themseves do.
I find it interesting that when someone is outspoken and speaks their truth, many of you find that rude. I personally think it is more rude to kiss ass at a site like DST and then come over here and lie, swear and spread gossip.
I would much rather have Ruby or Mommason as my friend than many of you who post here. Maybe we won't always agree, but at least we will know where we are coming from.
Not on any CTs not asking to be on any CTs sooooo the Ohh let me say she shouldn't be on CTs as an instigation.....Epic fail!!!
I have money sweets ... Do you need your EBT card refilled? Remember it's called SNAP now not Food Stamps ;)
I would not boycott a designer based on the actions of a CT member. That would be like someone not buying my companies products based on my behavior. In my opinion that would be a little narrow minded.
I don't find outspoken people rude, but Mommosan is rude. Ruby is not. I'm surprised you can't see the difference.
When anyone question Mommosan, she responds with a tantrum. She name calls, threatens and attacks.
When anyone questions Ruby, she responds calmly and coherently.
I would not boycott a designer based on the actions of a CT member. That would be like someone not buying my companies products based on my behavior. In my opinion that would be a little narrow minded.
March 16, 2010 5:32 PM
--------------
It happens. People on this blog have boycotted designers because of a CTM, they also apparently boycott stores who have rude sales people. Personally, I'd take it up with who ever is in charge.
Not on any CTs not asking to be on any CTs sooooo the Ohh let me say she shouldn't be on CTs as an instigation.....Epic fail!!!
I have money sweets ... Do you need your EBT card refilled? Remember it's called SNAP now not Food Stamps ;)
March 16, 2010 5:32 PM
ROFLMMFAO
SNAP LMMFAO I love it
I would not boycott a designer based on the actions of a CT member. That would be like someone not buying my companies products based on my behavior. In my opinion that would be a little narrow minded.
March 16, 2010 5:32 PM
There are ALOT of narrow minded stuck up people at DST! If you lurk long enough you can see who they are.
Not on any CTs not asking to be on any CTs sooooo the Ohh let me say she shouldn't be on CTs as an instigation.....Epic fail!!!
^^^^ Be happy your not.
It isn't fun to be at DST with invisible duct tape on your mouth when all you do is want to tell an egotistical designer to kiss your ass cause they won't stop bitching about the dumbest shit you have ever heard off.
^^^^
The narrow minded are not just limited to DST, they are here too.
Dear Princess Bitch,
Sorry you've been offended here, but you are really rude to people when there's so need to be.
This is a smack blog, there is a difference. Try to understand.
Thanks for using my title someone here at least has a sense of humor,
I haven't been offended. I missed the part where it could have possibly even come across as offended. I find anyone so pathetic that they can't stand behind what they say rude. I view people that call a spade a spade honest
I did in public what your little nest of pathetic losers does undercover. So that not only makes YOU the rude one but also makes you a sniveling hypocritical coward. But again kudos on the sense of humor.
The narrow minded are not just limited to DST, they are here too.
March 16, 2010 5:47 PM
LOL yes they are!
I have money sweets ... Do you need your EBT card refilled? Remember it's called SNAP now not Food Stamps ;)
March 16, 2010 5:32 PM
------
People who have real money don't feel the need to brag about it. I'm sure you have gobs and gobs of it on from that disability check.
Go ahead and stand tall and be proud of your bitchiness. It really shows off your classiness and maturity!
People who have real money don't feel the need to brag about it. I'm sure you have gobs and gobs of it on from that disability check.
Go ahead and stand tall and be proud of your bitchiness. It really shows off your classiness and maturity!
March 16, 2010 6:01 PM
Have to agree with this. Mommason might have had some valid points, but they were quickly obliterated by her rudeness, lack of class, and inability to write and/or type a coherent post.
Dear Princess Bitch,
You said: "I did in public what your little nest of pathetic losers does undercover. So that not only makes YOU the rude one but also makes you a sniveling hypocritical coward. But again kudos on the sense of humor."
No you didn't. You posted your remarks under the the username of The MomMason. Now really dear, is that your REAL name? Doubt it. You hide behind a fake name on a pretty anon talkboard at DST. Does everyone know what you look like, your home address, your real identity? Don't start throwing stones if you live in a glass house, cause you are dealing with ....
Queen Bitch :)
Not on any CTs not asking to be on any CTs sooooo the Ohh let me say she shouldn't be on CTs as an instigation.....Epic fail!!!
I have money sweets ... Do you need your EBT card refilled? Remember it's called SNAP now not Food Stamps ;)
What does this mean, not trying to be snarky, I really don't get it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I didn't get it either.
I didn't know that there was an income cap for CT work.
????
People don't CT because they are poor. They do it because they are talented and can score free stuff.
EBT Card
The Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) card is the identification card for the SNAP/Food Stamp Program. On the back is a magnetic strip that works in the machine at the grocery store
Why not Google it? You obviously have a some know how of your computer and the internet, why not use it?
they don't get what having money has to do with her reason for not being on CTs.
She's not on CTs because she ain't got no class. She can go ahead and think it's 'cause she's rich.
I view people that call a spade a spade honest
-----------
How about if I called a spade a shovel? Would that make me any less honest?
She's not on CTs because she ain't got no class. She can go ahead and think it's 'cause she's rich.
March 16, 2010 6:52 PM
Maybe she realizes that being on CT's really isnt worth it.
Some designers under appreciate their CT. Maybe she doesn't want to be used by those designers and get treated like shit.
Trust me you dont need talent to be on a CT team. I have seen horrible scrappers on CT teams. Why? They kiss designer ass nad turn themselves into forum whores to get noticed by designers lol
nad = and
smoking and typing don't work LOL
Lighten up 7:08
It wasn't meant to be a post about what is really required to get on a CT. It was to make a jab at Princess B who is annoying as hell.
Maybe she realizes that being on CT's really isnt worth it.
Some designers under appreciate their CT. Maybe she doesn't want to be used by those designers and get treated like shit.
Trust me you dont need talent to be on a CT team. I have seen horrible scrappers on CT teams. Why? They kiss designer ass nad turn themselves into forum whores to get noticed by designers lol
March 16, 2010 7:08 PM
-------
Another classy gal who can't get on a CT. Except this one is bitter.
A) You guys slay me with the lack of class and bitchiness posts .. Psst Dude you live on a BITCH board! *oh shit did you break one of your walls in that glass house?*
B) Dear Hooked on Phonics,
1) Me go in the fray when me see Hummie and you other bullies stalking the original poster to 7 places on the internet being cyber stalking jackasses
2) The "designers" that were touting the I deserve credit mantra do not credit when STEALING copywrite/trademark items.
3) If you want to be a bully then expect it back
4) If you are a psychotic loser that talks shit on a BASH board calling someone rude is laughable
5) If your "kits" contain 99% CU and scanned STOLEN items you are not a designer so get over yourself.
Can you read that?
C) Can the designer that does not want to be associated with me please post your design name cause I wouldn't want you to be sullied by taking my money.
D) Oh Oh the disability check comment ouch ouch that hurts oh oh oh wait yeah I'm 70% disabled and can still get my fat broken missing body parts ass to work! Please enjoy your right to be a dumbass, your welcome.
E)The person that reposted my comments sorry hard to tell who is the serial killers in training stalkers, what with the sheets and pointed hats on so many in here.
No you didn't. You posted your remarks under the the username of The MomMason. Now really dear, is that your REAL name? Doubt it. You hide behind a fake name on a pretty anon talkboard at DST. Does everyone know what you look like, your home address, your real identity? Don't start throwing stones if you live in a glass house, cause you are dealing with ....
Queen Bitch :)
Oh sorry you are actually correct. I thought with cyber stalker girl having tracked me "all over the internet" you knew who I was. Name is Hollie, Love your new name :0)
LOL! That was great!
You only made yourself look like even more of total disaster.
Just keep digging that hole! We need some entertainment around here.
Not on any CTs not asking to be on any CTs sooooo the Ohh let me say she shouldn't be on CTs as an instigation.....Epic fail!!!
I have money sweets ... Do you need your EBT card refilled? Remember it's called SNAP now not Food Stamps ;)
What does this mean, not trying to be snarky, I really don't get it.
But I like snarky! and EBT card is what welfare and food stamps (now called SNAP) recipients get their cash and food stamp money on it was a total bitch move on my part. See anon tried to play a little mind game of ohh let's make her think we big bad anons can get her kicked off a CT then some other anons or same person who knows jump in with the pitchforks poking but what they still have not gotten is their "attacks" that will frustrate and hurt other peoples feelings don't work on me cause these people have nothing to do with reality. At best this is a reality game called "make the bash bitches cry" ;-)
I view people that call a spade a spade honest
-----------
How about if I called a spade a shovel? Would that make me any less honest?
No but it makes you Funnest post of the last 20 posts!
Mommason~
Don't listen to the soccer moms. They live on here while their husbands are off cheating lol
^^^^^
How ironic that you now think I'm funny. Posting anon does have it's advantages.
Mommason~
Don't listen to the soccer moms. They live on here while their husbands are off cheating lol
March 16, 2010 7:37 PM
---------------
Smacking the smackees, really, what does that make you?
But I like snarky! and EBT card is what welfare and food stamps (now called SNAP) recipients get their cash and food stamp money on it was a total bitch move on my part.
---------
I'm not getting how that is a bitch move? Dissing someone on welfare is a bitch move?
Smacking the smackees, really, what does that make you?
March 16, 2010 7:42 PM
^^^
Bored LOL
She's not on CTs because she ain't got no class.
At no point did I say I was rich but you might want to check that contraction "hooked on Phonics" is in the house ya know... ain't contraction for am not..So you said She's not on CT's because she am not got no class. that might even be a double negative thus meaning I do have class can we get a ruling from "Hooked on Phonics" please.
How ironic that you now think I'm funny. Posting anon does have it's advantages.
I may still think you are a jackass for other things but I'm not taking from your funny..Just like if you think I'm a rude bitch for things on this issue you might find me quite nice or at least amurassurassing in other things.
I'm not getting how that is a bitch move? Dissing someone on welfare is a bitch move?
I was throwing a low blow since CT girl wanted to play low blows. I am saying that I was being mean to be mean. Bash board that is what you guys do right? I can own my mean.
I'll openly admit I can be a bitch and probably a jackass too.
I'll openly admit I can be a bitch and probably a jackass too.
Amen sista Testify!!!
Bash board that is what you guys do right? I can own my mean.
-----------
It's not what I do. I just skip right past the stupid and unnecessary smacks, like I do anywhere else, unless I get really POed about it.
Like some of the others here, I just try and be a voice of reason, or at least a thinking voice. It doesn't always work.
Mommason~
Don't listen to the soccer moms. They live on here while their husbands are off cheating lol
No worries kiddo this is better than NCIS reruns they wanna play I say "let's play" as long as i have them annoyed and frazzled trying to figure out a snappy comeback they think will garner attention from me they are not bashing others that might get hurt feelings by their vapid attempts at low blows
I find it interesting that when someone is outspoken and speaks their truth, many of you find that rude. I personally think it is more rude to kiss ass at a site like DST and then come over here and lie, swear and spread gossip.
I would much rather have Ruby or Mommason as my friend than many of you who post here. Maybe we won't always agree, but at least we will know where we are coming from.
March 16, 2010 5:21 PM
------------------------------
They both seem to have a lot of good points or interesting things to say, BUT there is no need to be insulting when you do it. It is actually possible to be outspoken and honest without being insulting or condescending.
When anyone questions Ruby, she responds calmly and coherently.
March 16, 2010 5:36 PM
------------------------
At times, and at times she is extremely condescending in a slightly veiled but not really kind of way.
It's not what I do. I just skip right past the stupid and unnecessary smacks, like I do anywhere else, unless I get really POed about it.
Like some of the others here, I just try and be a voice of reason, or at least a thinking voice. It doesn't always work.
Dude again YOU are a regular on a BASH board. There is no reasoning with bash board bullies. This is your bully life hide here and think you are bigger and badder than every one of your "victims" in this case you will lose.
They both seem to have a lot of good points or interesting things to say, BUT there is no need to be insulting when you do it. It is actually possible to be outspoken and honest without being insulting or condescending.
Ohh does a widdle bash board groupy want some attention? You're Hummie and "designer" buddies picked the wrong day to gang up on someone. Your little gang wanted an easy target but you happened to get someone willing to stand up to your circle talk backing them up in their right to an opinion. IF I was rude at that point the little witches I was rude to had already spent a day hounding someone all over the internet. It did not come from no where sweets.
Other people stood up for Jenn too and they weren't rude. You weren't the only one so get off your little super hero kick.
For the next person that wants to call me rude please back check your MILES of posts on your bash board
1) name calling
2) ripping on layouts that you "don't like"
3) ripping on designers
....................................................................................................... pot meet kettle
Dude again YOU are a regular on a BASH board. There is no reasoning with bash board bullies. This is your bully life hide here and think you are bigger and badder than every one of your "victims" in this case you will lose.
March 16, 2010 8:19 PM
------------
Faulty argument. I don't bully, but think what you wish if it gives you a much needed superiority jolt.
For the next person that wants to call me rude please back check your MILES of posts on your bash board
1) name calling
2) ripping on layouts that you "don't like"
3) ripping on designers
....................................................................................................... pot meet kettle
March 16, 2010 8:28 PM
--------------------
Haven't done any of those things. Next please.
Other people stood up for Jenn too and they weren't rude. You weren't the only one so get off your little super hero kick.
It's the tights and the cape Love them....
Faulty argument. I don't bully, but think what you wish if it gives you a much needed superiority jolt.
You living on bash board sureeeeeee sweets we believe you....you just come for the articles.... keep telling yourself that maybe it will make you feel better about yourself
Ohh does a widdle bash board groupy want some attention? You're Hummie and "designer" buddies picked the wrong day to gang up on someone. Your little gang wanted an easy target but you happened to get someone willing to stand up to your circle talk backing them up in their right to an opinion. IF I was rude at that point the little witches I was rude to had already spent a day hounding someone all over the internet. It did not come from no where sweets.
March 16, 2010 8:24 PM
-----------------------------
Yes and your understated reactions are really proving your class here as well.
For the next person that wants to call me rude please back check your MILES of posts on your bash board
1) name calling
2) ripping on layouts that you "don't like"
3) ripping on designers
....................................................................................................... pot meet kettle
March 16, 2010 8:28 PM
---------------------------------
Guess what, I don't do any of those things and I still think you are rude.
Kettle meet pot.
I don't believe the term bitch or asshole is an insult LOL
I can be a bitch and an asshole. I worked hard to get to that status. Sheesh!
***Yes and your understated reactions are really proving your class here as well.
I don't need class to bash bashing little bitches or have you not figured that out yet?
****Guess what, I don't do any of those things and I still think you are rude.
Kettle meet pot.
And I think you are a skanky little basher that can't own the things you have said on here. Lets see 3 little bash board bitches that continue to want to play one up-manship ~honey that is tell tell sign of a bashing little shanks but oh look you say you haven't said anything please this bash board would be empty if all you little angels were not tarnished trash ... next
I'm impressed that you know how many people are posting.
Your super hero powers are improving.
Of course, it would all be more creditable if you didn't keep hanging around here, making you, by your own argument, a bash board bitch.
keep telling yourself that maybe it will make you feel better about yourself
March 16, 2010 8:32 PM
--------------
I don't have to tell myself anything. I know my motives. I wish you could be as clear sighted.
15 mins till my bed time are we done for today my little bash skanks?
We shall continue to bash into the night, it will give you something to come back for.
Of course, it would all be more creditable if you didn't keep hanging around here, making you, by your own argument, a bash board bitch.
3of you piped up with your innocence so that is what I counted oh epic fail at snappy retort BB
I also seem to recall me stating you wanted to play so here I am let's play. I don't need to tuck tail and run away from the likes of you. You are a basher full time I know and not accustomed to someone not finding you threatening or wanting to run away crying... When you stop playing with me I'll go away but you will still be here being a wart on the ass of humanity
We shall continue to bash into the night, it will give you something to come back for.
Can you maybe come up with something a little more snappy at least you guys are getting kinda boring with the professions of innocence and all
And make sure Hooked on Phonics gives a ruling on the double negative cause I'll all a twitter waiting to see if one of you actually said I had class.
Night lurkers hope you enjoyed the show remember to tip your wait staff ;-)
I'll = I'm crap Hooked on Phonics is soo gonna red pen me on that one damn damn damn
You are a basher full time I know and not accustomed to someone not finding you threatening or wanting to run away crying...
-------------
That made me laugh out loud because it was so ridiculous.
Can you maybe come up with something a little more snappy at least you guys are getting kinda boring with the professions of innocence and all
______________
I like to keep it simple, it makes for easier understanding.
'No but it makes you Funnest post of the last 20 posts!'
no no no I must disagree ... YOURS was the funniest post ... Dear Hooked On Phonics ... Please enjoy your right to be a dumbass, your welcome.... priceless. I had to text them to my hubby so he could know why I was laughing so hard.
If you are going to quote here, could you PLEASE put < i> but without the spaces before the quote and < /i> after?
And I think you are a skanky little basher that can't own the things you have said on here. Lets see 3 little bash board bitches that continue to want to play one up-manship ~honey that is tell tell sign of a bashing little shanks but oh look you say you haven't said anything please this bash board would be empty if all you little angels were not tarnished trash ... next
March 16, 2010 8:41 PM
-------------------------------
Wow, I think your posts say more about you than you realize. Such a charmer.
I wish I could be so mean and so funny all at once. Seriously. No bashing. You are my hero.
Shouldn't you still be in mourning TheMommason? I mean, why waste your time here?
I'll openly admit I can be a bitch and probably a jackass too.
_______________________________
But I'm Queen Bitch and don't you forget it!
....getting tired of all these upstarts trying to edge me out.
TheMommason said...
She's not on CTs because she ain't got no class.
At no point did I say I was rich but you might want to check that contraction "hooked on Phonics" is in the house ya know... ain't contraction for am not..So you said She's not on CT's because she am not got no class. that might even be a double negative thus meaning I do have class can we get a ruling from "Hooked on Phonics" please.
March 16, 2010 7:48 PM
_____________________
I normally just skip past spelling errors, typos, grammar problems, whatever. We are all human. No one cares about that kind of thing. This isn't a literature class.
But come on...REALLY? Are you truly here throwing out grammar insults? YOU????? And you want to talk about glass houses! Sheesh!!
You may actually have had a legitimate point...somewhere in your many long rants...regarding designer crediting. However, none of us will ever know because your sentence structure, grammar and spelling are so bad that your posts are ALMOST but not quite, written in the English language.
Seriously, other than the fact that you've declared your self "princess bitch" (a label which imo is the only legitimate statement you've made) I'm not sure I clearly understand any of your arguments. You really are not good at expressing yourself. Your anger and bitterness are coming across loud and clear. But your point is lost.
I'm sure your intention is to appear strong and intelligent. But you really come off as classless and rude.
Anonymous TheMommason said...
Faulty argument. I don't bully, but think what you wish if it gives you a much needed superiority jolt.
You living on bash board sureeeeeee sweets we believe you....you just come for the articles.... keep telling yourself that maybe it will make you feel better about yourself
March 16, 2010 8:32 PM
---------------------------------
And you just come here to spew more of your bitchiness. Why don't you just fuck off and be done with it! If you had something useful to say we might overlook your nasty dispostion but as you are intent on just being a bitch with useless verbal diarrhea you really should just fuck the hell off.
Any opinions on Maya's blog post? I found it really interesting, and VERY well written, but...I'm still not sure what her point was. Scrappers and designers are on the same team, so we should all, um, what exactly?
My opinion is that Maya wrote a long history of digiscrap that didn't really say anything.
And that it's another example of the disfunction within the community. Yet again, it really isn't customer driven. Until digi wakes up and starts listening to what the people who actually pay for the products want, then yes, designers will continue to not sell products.
But instead we have to focus on the circle relationship that the designer and customer have. That right there is what made digiscrap an insane community. I know designers are scrappers too but they are the ones that stepped into selling. I believe that a seperation of the groups could actually be good for the community and take the pressure off of the customer to market products for designers. Word of mouth is a good thing but not if people have stopped posting in galleries because they are too bored with crediting each and every little scratch on their layout. And tired of designers dictating every little bit of useage allowed on their already commonplace and commercial use items.
If you don't want to give up the rights to your artwork and always need to be credited for personal glory, then don't sell graphics!
mommason is a man hating cunt.
But I'm Queen Bitch and don't you forget it!
....getting tired of all these upstarts trying to edge me out.
March 16, 2010 9:49 PM
---------
Go right ahead. I'd rather be a courtier any day. The Marquise from Dangerous Liaisons is my idol.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
mommason is a man hating cunt.
March 17, 2010 12:40 AM
-----------------
And you, my dear, are no better.
Any opinions on Maya's blog post? I found it really interesting, and VERY well written, but...I'm still not sure what her point was. Scrappers and designers are on the same team, so we should all, um, what exactly?
March 16, 2010 11:26 PM
If it was so well written, you shouldn't be confused. Her point should be very clear, and yet it isn't.
My opinion is that Maya wrote a long history of digiscrap that didn't really say anything.
That pretty much sums it up for me. The whole thing could have been done in two or three paragraphs. Maya does tend to waffle on, which is a shame, as she has interesting things to say, but finding those interesting things is difficult.
Any views on Jewel's response?
It isn't fun to be at DST with invisible duct tape on your mouth when all you do is want to tell an egotistical designer to kiss your ass cause they won't stop bitching about the dumbest shit you have ever heard off.
March 16, 2010 5:47 PM
You'd feel much better if you'd talk about this. What exactly was Whiney Designer complaining about? What store does she sell at? Are her kits really worth all that?
I'm guessing Mason's Mom or whoever JUST LOOOOVES it here because she can be really really obnoxious without getting banned. And just because you use your forum name in here doesn't make you less anonymous. There's really no difference between this area and a forum, aside that here you can be rude with zero fluff around it, you can pretty much say what you want without worrying about getting your account suspended and you don't have to register. See, I can have a username, too. Doesn't mean you know who I really am.
If it was so well written, you shouldn't be confused. Her point should be very clear, and yet it isn't.
March 17, 2010 1:20 AM
---------------------
I should have been more clear myself. She writes well, as in an interesting, easy-to-read style. But yeah, clarity of thought was lacking, thus my other comment.
See, I can have a username, too. Doesn't mean you know who I really am.
March 17, 2010 10:09 AM
-----------------
Anonymity is relative. We don't have her full name and social security number, but she's less anonymous than people who don't go by their regular user name.
Ummmmm, think Disney & Tim Horton approved this commercial use of their graphics for this ad?
I think not. Why would you even dream that this is ok?
http://www.anelia.net/
Anominity is relative. We don't have her full name and social security number, but she's still
less anonymous because she goes by a user name that's all over the web.
She might be rude, but she's got balls, so don't pretend otherwise.
oops- anonymity
March 17, 2010 12:23 AM
ITA with your thoughts. All I really got from Maya's ramblings (which is only her version of history) is that people who don't want to always credit have a different moral code. *eyeroll*
wow I haven't been here for a few days and look out!
I just popped in to see if anyone is in the ADSR? I'm not participating and am glad, not because of the challenges but a few of the participants and their bitch fest about a few of the challenges. My friend who is linked me up to some of the 'questions' and 'comment's. Wow a few have definitely tag teamed, makes you think they had their comment predetermined. The latest is wah wah over a card. Funny how I recognize the name of the one person as someone suddenly popping up on all kinds of hybrid teams. Think I will be crossing those designers off my list as I don't want to ask a question and get my head bit off or talked down to by one of her CT members.
Ummmmm, think Disney & Tim Horton approved this commercial use of their graphics for this ad?
I think not. Why would you even dream that this is ok?
http://www.anelia.net/
March 17, 2010 11:30 AM
------------------
It's not okay, but I have to admit, she did a great job--love the alpha/font/whatever.
I signed up, did you?
Ok I know I'm being lazy, but can someone link me to Maya's blog?
tips@disneyantipiracy.com
I already reported it, but multiple reports can't hurt.
And no, I didn't sign up. That would make me a hypocrite.
Maya's blog
http://www.scrapbookgraphics.com/mayasweb/?p=308
[i]And no, I didn't sign up. That would make me a hypocrite.[/i]
That and if she introduces her site this way, what does it say about her view of copyright? I probably wouldn't user her stuff based on that. She has not contact address either, which is annoying.
It says the same thing about her as it does everyone else who violates copyright. How many CT layouts and kit previews have I seen with the characters from Disney's Alice in Wonderland lately? Did you report every single one of those too?
wv: weari, as in I'm so damned weari of all the copyright angst. It's boring.
I've been following the "Nice" thread at DST, and based on the latest post I think I finally figured out what the OP was ticked about. Is it because she's playing the Praise Game, and someone gave her fake, thoughtless praise? I bet that most of the praise is going to be fake and/or thoughtless if you play the Praise Game. That's what happens when people are forced to comment on layouts they don't like. If you get a "nice," it might be the only thing that they could come up with that wouldn't hurt your feelings.
[i]And no, I didn't sign up. That would make me a hypocrite.[/i]
That and if she introduces her site this way, what does it say about her view of copyright? I probably wouldn't user her stuff based on that. She has not contact address either, which is annoying.
Almost! lol You need to use the < not the [ to do italics.
Thanks for trying, it really makes things easier to keep track of here when there are so many posts quoting other posts. :)
Another blatant abuse of copyright:
http://www.digishoptalk.com/boards/showthread.php?t=233937
And she's a "Design Member" of DST! Good grief!
What is a 'Design Member' anyway?
LOL @ "inspired" by Twilight. A design member is someone with access to the DCR.
I don't think so! If that was the case, everyone would have "Design Team" under their avatar. Doesn't DST have it's own so-called "design team"?
And even if she is only using that image on her preview and not including it in her kit, she is violating copyright. Ads are for commercial use.
Another blatant abuse of copyright:
http://www.digishoptalk.com/boards/showthread.php?t=233937
its gone - what was it? Im dying of curiosity...
I don't think so! If that was the case, everyone would have "Design Team" under their avatar. Doesn't DST have it's own so-called "design team"?
I *think* that means she has paid to post her previews in the designer forums?
6:46
It was a preview of her "twilight inspired" kit. The preview had an image of the 2 lead characters which was obviously taken from the Twilight website or elsewhere on the net or possible from a magazine.
wv: sobscri - she'll sob and cry when she gets sued LOL
Doesn't DST have it's own so-called "design team"?
That's what I thought. Can't designers choose on of their kits and pay $300? or something and the dst dt team makes layouts for the insider?
That's what I thought. Can't designers choose on of their kits and pay $300? or something and the dst dt team makes layouts for the insider?
March 17, 2010 7:29 PM
------------------
Huh?
Ummmmm, think Disney & Tim Horton approved this commercial use of their graphics for this ad?
I think not. Why would you even dream that this is ok?
-------
I don't think Tim Horton would care. Tim Burton might though. Now I want coffee.
I've been following the "Nice" thread at DST, and based on the latest post I think I finally figured out what the OP was ticked about. Is it because she's playing the Praise Game, and someone gave her fake, thoughtless praise? I bet that most of the praise is going to be fake and/or thoughtless if you play the Praise Game. That's what happens when people are forced to comment on layouts they don't like. If you get a "nice," it might be the only thing that they could come up with that wouldn't hurt your feelings.
March 17, 2010 2:37 PM
-----------------
I really did feel like replying to her and advising her to not play the praise game and just wait for comments that come normally, if that's what she's after.
Doesn't DST have it's own so-called "design team"?
That's what I thought. Can't designers choose on of their kits and pay $300? or something and the dst dt team makes layouts for the insider?
March 17, 2010 7:29 PM
-----------------------------------
It says design team under my avatar and I haven't paid DST for anything including the product gallery. The only thing I have is access to the DCR which is why I said it's for people who have access to the DCR.
She might be rude, but she's got balls, so don't pretend otherwise.
March 17, 2010 11:35 AM
--------------
Balls on a girl look weird.
Another blatant abuse of copyright:
http://www.digishoptalk.com/boards/showthread.php?t=233937
its gone - what was it? Im dying of curiosity...
-----------------------------------
http://www.shop-digitalscrap.com/site/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=24_1&products_id=45
She might want to remove the Smurfs kit, too. I've never seen those dolls before but I'm sure they are copyright protected also.
It was a preview of her "twilight inspired" kit. The preview had an image of the 2 lead characters which was obviously taken from the Twilight website or elsewhere on the net or from a magazine.
Le Sigh. Obviously someone got to her because the thread is gone. Wonder if she will learn from it...probably not.
I called one designer out via email about her 'Disney-Inspired' kit and her response was that it was in hommage and 'fair use'. Uh. No. Fair Use doesn't apply when you SELL things.
Hey TheMommason, aka Princess Bitch - why don't you go home and come back when you can spell or better yet, put together words in a comprehensive sentence.
http://www.shop-digitalscrap.com/site/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=24_1&products_id=10
Yes, smurfs are copyrighted. I wouldn't buy anything from that store now. I'd be too worried that other things there are also violating copyrights.
That smurf kit is awful. It's just flood filled images. The papers are boring too. There's no texture to any of it. Very amateurish indeed.
It says design team under my avatar and I haven't paid DST for anything including the product gallery. The only thing I have is access to the DCR which is why I said it's for people who have access to the DCR.
March 17, 2010 8:18 PM
-----------------------------------
I have access to the DCR and have nothing under my avatar. Some in there have "Design Team", some have "Gold Member" but the majority have nothing.
Maybe someone who is in the know can enlighten us??
Balls on a girl look weird.
March 17, 2010 8:18 PM
--------------------------
Maybe she's actually a he-she?
Huh?
Oh the DST "Hot Product": designers or stores pay to have a kit pimped. It (the kit) used to be featured on the home page (not sure if it still is) and a bunch of layouts are put in the DST Insider.
Oh, I see. Do they still do it? If so, it's not very effective--I've never noticed it at all.
You'd want to sell a lot of that kit to come out even let alone ahead after paying that $300 LOL
^^^^^^^^
Thank you, Mr. Asian Spammer.
So, a question. What do you think are the trends these days? I'm seeing a lot of painted papers and elements, and also a lot of simple, graphic kits. Grey, too--lots of grey (rather depressing).
I am also seeing simple graphic templates. I'm not sure why scrappers buy these. If you already have PS or PSE it is pretty easy to create these yourself.
I am also seeing simple graphic templates. I'm not sure why scrappers buy these. If you already have PS or PSE it is pretty easy to create these yourself.
March 18, 2010 2:15 PM
I so agree! There are a few template designers that just rearrange their templates then sell them as a new pack. I think people are getting ripped off lol
All you have to do is flip it yourself and you have whats in the new pack lol
I agree too! I think if you want to be a "designer," template designing is the easiest way.
I don't just flip my templates and try selling them as a "new" pack. I haven't noticed anyone doing that either. My templates are all different designs made from scratch and I'd never dream of pulling a stunt like flipping and trying to pass them off as "new".
Which template designers are you talking about anyway. I'd be curious to know.
I didn't say they were! They look that way to me.
There are way to many template designers out there.
I agree designing templates is so easy to do. It isn't rocket science.
Which is why a new template designer pops up every week, lol.
I've never thought very highly of Hummie at all and would have been happy that someone called her out on stalking Jenn, but the Mommason made herself look just as bad as Hummie--maybe even worse.
I don't know who the other poster is talking about, but I saw a template the other day from Emily Powers that was essentially a small square in the middle of the page with a few lines for journaling. She's selling it for $2.49. But if she can get someone to buy it, more power to her. I figure there's probably a market for almost anything these days.
I don't know who the other poster is talking about, but I saw a template the other day from Emily Powers that was essentially a small square in the middle of the page with a few lines for journaling. She's selling it for $2.49. But if she can get someone to buy it, more power to her. I figure there's probably a market for almost anything these days.
Maybe this type of thing is useful for people that can't scrap 'simple', but want to. Sometimes I have the problem of putting too many things on a page.
Templates can speed up scrapping. For instance, you like to make an annual family album but don't have the time to do or think about each page separately. Using a template speeds up the process, because the basics are already there, all you do is add the paper and elements and you can still change it up if you want.
Well now TheMommason has protected her Tweets.
^^^^^
What's the point of throwing a tantrum in private?
The design team thing under the names at DST has nothing to do with a DST design team. Someone asked about it when it first started popping up and they said they were going through all of the designers who had access to the DCR one by one and added that to their name so that it wouldn't be easier to tell who had access and if they were still selling or not.
That would be so it WOULD be easier to tell who had access to the DCR.
At one point designers were complaining that there were so many designers coming and going that it was hard to tell who was still selling. That was the solution. You see the design thing, you can check their siggy to see if they have a shop.
Why do they care if someone is no longer actively selling but still has access? Do former designers have nothing useful to contribute?
I can see having a seperate forum for designers to discuss business issues, but I've often wondered why it's necessary for it to be private. Can anyone explain?
Because it's business talk. There's really no need for the customer to know about stuff like that.
Generally, the customer is not invited to business meetings of the stores they shop at.
To have access to the DCR, you have to be currently selling. If you leave all stores your access is removed. Start selling again and your access is reanabled.
Why do they care if someone is no longer actively selling but still has access? Do former designers have nothing useful to contribute?
-----------------------
I would think that designers who have retired or gone out of business might have very valuable experiences to share.
They may very well but that is just the rules at DST. It's always been that way and no designer has complained that I'm aware of. They just accept that it is the rule. Unless YOU are a designer I don't see why you should be worried about who has and who hasn't got access to the DCR anyway.
And perhaps YOU should remove the pole from YOUR butt, and stop worrying so much about what OTHER people want to know.
:-)
There's no need to be rude. It's right though, unless you are a designer you shouldn't be worried about such things.
OK. I AM designer and it's just A-OK like it is now in the DCR.
When I worked in corporate, we didn't have clients or customers at our meetings. Don't see the need for their participation or voyeurism now.
I'm just a scrapper and don't even notice that the DCR is there half the time. I'm not sure why some people get so hung up about it.
I don't see that anyone is hung up about it. Unless you equate asking a question with being hung up.
Why so defensive?
Because it's business talk. There's really no need for the customer to know about stuff like that.
__________________________________________
LOL - while a lot of descriptors could be used to describe conversations in the DCR, "business talk" is not even close. What business? Where to purchase CU? That's about all I see as of late. Just designers looking for other designer's work to use in their designs.
Yes, but at least there's no bitching going on like in the regular forums. It's a haven away from the stupid threads about "to credit or not to credit".......... talk about a bunch of wadded asses in that one LOL
why wadded asses? seems a good convo to me.
Yes, but at least there's no bitching going on like in the regular forums. It's a haven away from the stupid threads about "to credit or not to credit".......... talk about a bunch of wadded asses in that one LOL
March 19, 2010 10:17 PM
---------------------
You're an idiot. That's the first interesting conversation that's been in that forum for months.
Not finding something intersting does no make someone an idiot. Only an idiot would say that. Guess that makes you the idiot then.
I don't see that anyone is hung up about it. Unless you equate asking a question with being hung up.
Why so defensive?
March 19, 2010 8:42 PM
-------------
Who's being defensive? I merely said I don't see why people are hung up about it. How is that defensive?
I have a question for those who use Facebook. I'm just curious.
Do you become a fan of someone's page because it was "suggested" and you feel obligated OR hope the favor will be returned and they will become a fan of your page too??? Or do you only become a fan of designers' pages that you REALLY like?
I find it really annoying to ignore a page suggestion only to be invited again, and again, and again by the same person.
Maybe I'm a bitch but I don't want to become a fan of designers whose designs I have not and will not ever use. It has become all too clear that many people only add others as friends for the sole purpose of gaining more fans.
hey 10:53 your full of shit. I just looked through Emily's shop and there is only one other template that is mostly a square with text. Its a couple years older than the one that was recently released that you referred to. I have actually scrapped with both. Love the older one and have used it multiple times so I would say its worth 2.50$$. I happen to use templates as a creative base not just to copy and pasts shapes. The most recently released actually allowed me to make a page in less than 30 minutes. I was happy with it and it helped with my low mojo. No need to bash on Emily. Everyhing she makes is top quality and worth the money.She has more artistic talent than many designers. YEAH YEAH I am a long time loyal customer to her because I have never bought a product I didnt like from her and her costomer service is top-notch.
^^^
Thanks Emily, good to know you read the blog!
Well Emily "fan", if you REALLY loved your designer, you would never post their name on this blog.
On that note, this blog has no effect on designers unless they are getting caught copying or such. MOST everything discussed here is a bunch of bull shit and worthless opinions fueled by ulterior motives and green eyed monsters.
For example, when I first started designing, my name had got brought up here. 4 or 5 people commented that they had purchased my stuff and that the quality was horrible. One actually went as far to say that she was forced to demanded a refund from my store based on the terror of it. The funny part is that I had never sold even one kit at the time, neither did a CT have access to my kits(two at the time).
Gotta love it and laugh. :)
Why do you think people were making up lies about you? It just seems, I don't know, odd.
Or do you only become a fan of designers' pages that you REALLY like?
I find it really annoying to ignore a page suggestion only to be invited again, and again, and again by the same person.
--------------
I never get fan requests. I don't have very many digital scrapbookers on my friends list. I am, however, a true fan of many designers. I love seeing the new releases and sales posts in my facebook feed.
I have rejected friend requests from digital scrapbookers that I don't know IRL. And I don't feel bad about it either. I just click "I don't know this person".
But on the fan page, just don't accept or ignore then you won't be invited back again and again. I think multiple requests like that is like a telemarketer calling repeatedly.
I agree. Why are you "friends" with a bunch of people you don't know? Seriously, you said it yourself that they only become friends to advertise. You do realize you have control over this? Right?
Start unfriending and you'll get less of those requests. If you don't want to play that game then you have to completely jump out. Otherwise you're getting what you ask for.
(((Why do you think people were making up lies about you? It just seems, I don't know, odd.)))
Beats me. Though it's really more annoying than odd. Is this kind of behavior really so shocking to you?
Shocking is too strong a word--it's just weird. Must be the sheltered life I lead.
But on the fan page, just don't accept or ignore then you won't be invited back again and again
---------
That doesn't work. I haven't been on FB since forever, as I really don't get it the whole hype. I'm still getting fan of requests and probably have multiple of them from the same people. It's just tacky.
I am surprised that no one has brought up the fact that the wording on that template is from a very famous children's book. Isn't that like a big no no right there???
Post a Comment